I've certainly had my fair share of opinions on Josh Gordon over the years, all of which I stand behind:
- He put out questionable effort on the practice field and behind the scenes when he was a member of the Cleveland Browns;
- The Patriots were so inept at the position -- and had failed in a number of different attempts to stock the position over the offseason -- their desperation at the spot caused them to bring in Gordon, a move they normally would not have entertained (and had turned down in previous years for that same reason — they weren't that desperate);
- Bringing in one of the least dependable players in NFL history put the team at risk if he was suspended again before the end of the season;
- He was good with the Patriots, but that doesn't mean he was the right move. When you go from nothing to something ... a lot of players could have filled that role and been productive. It's similar to the Sony Michel situation: Sure, he was productive. But any number of players would have had the same level of production, if given the chance. Just because Player X got the job done, it doesn't mean Player X was the reason. They were just in the right place at the right time.
Jared
Goff
Sean
McVay
Julian
Edelman
Braxton
Berrios
Cody
Hollister
Damoun
Patterson
Darren
Andrews
Steve
Howe
wouldn't
Production
Randy
Moss
Bill Belichick
David Patten
Fit
Tom
Brady
Michael
Floyd
Risk
Cost
Ja'Whaun Bentley
Marcus Cannon
Matthew Slater
When
A.J. Green, DeSean Jackson, Emmanuel Sanders, DeVante Parker, Sterling Shepard, Josh Doctson
back
