3 concerning trends from Bruins’ recent 3-game slump taken at TD Garden (Bruins)

(Photo by Steve Babineau/NHLI via Getty Images)

A third-period rally might have allowed the Bruins to at least escape with a point on Sunday night, but there were few positives thrown around in the locker room after Boston’s 3-2 shootout loss to the Flyers — the club’s third loss in a row. 

“Way too many sloppy plays and turning back and not moving forward,” Patrice Bergeron said. “When you do that, everyone is kind of guessing on the ice and no one is really on the same page and they take it to you."

During a 10-period stretch that started on Monday against the Penguins and carried over into the first two stanzas of Sunday’s showdown, the Bruins have labored in all areas of the ice, with opponents tallying 15 goals during that four-game duration.

But D-zone lapses are far from the only concerning trend that Bruce Cassidy and his staff have taken note of during this recent skid. 

Poor rush coverage is putting Boston behind the 8-ball

Cassidy has harped on Boston’s coverage of opposing rushes — or rather, the lack thereof — as a shortcoming of this club for most of the first six weeks of the regular season. 

Many factors often contribute to odd-man counters down the ice and a D corps’ faults when it comes to keeping opposing skaters in front of it. But for Cassidy, the failure to adhere to the finer details of the game has often drawn the most consternation out of him during said sequences.

Brett Ritchie skating off for a line change in the midst of a Montreal rush on Tuesday — which ended with a tally from Paul Byron — generated plenty of ire from Cassidy following that 5-4 defeat, and the B’s bench boss was once again less than thrilled on Sunday when Charlie McAvoy jumped up into the play and gathered a puck behind the Flyers’ net in the first. 


While McAvoy tried to feed the puck to
Sean Kuraly
out in the slot, it was recovered in short order by the Flyers, who promptly countered with a 4-on-1 rush against
Matt Grzelcyk. 


As is often the case on odd-man rushes, it wasn’t the first or even second scoring bid that cashed in. But with Boston’s defensive layers in shambles, it was a trailing
Travis Konecny
that ultimately potted the puck past
Jaroslav Halak
to open the scoring in the first period. 


Boston might emphasize offense from the blue line as a potential fix for its slumping offense, but there’s a fine line between assertive and overly aggressive in the O-zone. Unfortunately for McAvoy,




he paid the price on Sunday. 






A sluggish breakout is stalling Boston’s offense






Those poor numbers — especially to that degree — are only tangible if you’re spending a lot of time in your own zone. Over the last year or so, Boston hasn’t had much of an issue when it comes to carrying the puck out under duress, especially with the B’s D corps featuring a number of shifty skaters such as
Matt Grzelcyk
and
Charlie McAvoy. 








“I don’t think we had enough urgency, would be the simple answer,” Cassidy said of Boston’s showing in the early going on Sunday. “We weren’t breaking pucks out, got stuck below our goal line. In every facet there are — we never got an opportunity to sort of put them on their heels, in any way, shape or form …
A concern to me is getting out of our end a little quicker, we’ve got to — you know, we have some smaller guys in the lineup with foot speed, so you hope that that’s an advantage with breaking pucks out, but right now it isn’t. 


“I thought there was some goalie-(defense) communication issues as well. We could have been cleaner. And then the forwards get frustrated so they don’t manage it through the neutral zone, so they’re not seeing as much as they’d like and it snowballs. That would be my concern that we’ll start addressing tomorrow. “


A surprising lack of urgency





"Poor. That’s about it," Cassidy said. "To sum it up, it was poor."


For a veteran club looking to put a miserable regulation loss to a woeful Red Wings team in the rearview mirror, Sunday's showing — especially in the opening 30 minutes of play — was startling. It wasn't just that the Flyers built themselves a 2-0 lead by the time both clubs returned to their locker rooms for the first intermission. Rather, it was more about the lack of response from Boston upon falling into an early hole, with the B's only landing three shots on goal during a whopping 18:00 of 5v5 TOI in the first period.


Again, multiple factors contributed to that wretched start, but something's going to have to give sooner rather than later with the club — especially with matchups against the Maple Leafs and Capitals scheduled for later this week. If Boston is once again sipping decaf when the puck drops then? It's going to get ugly.


"At the end of the day, we need to be on time," Cassidy said. "That’s when we’re at our best. I think they understand that, and I think every team would like that, so we’ll keep hammering away on that. I don’t know if it’s an energy issue right now because we talked about ... sometime we thought it was the residual effect of last year. Maybe it’s kicking in earlier than we thought; I don’t know. We’ll talk to the players about that and see where it leads."

Loading...
Loading...